
Snap-Back Rollers V 1.1 Monolift Attachment
A fresh take on classic monolift attachments, the Snap-Back Rollers use torsion springs—no counterweights—to instantly clear the bar path, letting you lift from your true start position.
Snap-Back Rollers V 1.1 Monolift Attachment Reviews
Based on 5 reviews from Gym Radar users, the Mutant Metals Snap-Back Rollers V 1.1 Monolift Attachment have an average rating of 4.87 out of 5. They're currently the #11 most-owned J-Cups on Gym Radar, with 25 home gyms reporting ownership.
5 Reviews
Performance
5.00 / 5
Build Quality
5.00 / 5
Value
4.60 / 5
User Reviews
Leave a Review
(4.33)
these things are great. I won them in the GGC.
They are amazing for bench press. makes bench amazing.
I really cant use them on squat. reracking is kind hard and unsafe

(5.00)
These things are great. Got them to fit on my old infinity series r3 rogue rack. They hold high diameter bars just as well as standard diameter bars. One of the best purchases I’ve made for my gym. Both due to being old and not having a liftoff.

(5.00)
These spring loaded Monos, compared to the larger, more cumbersome counterweighted hockey stick-styled monolifts are compact and awesome and I hope Rogue picks these up from Chris like some of his other items. They also have the added utility of incorporating rollers.
Benching - They are super sweet and took zero getting used to. They allow for a perfect lift off every time and it just seems very natural.
Squatting - I had to get used to setting up slightly differently for squat because it felt strange not walking out to set up for squat. Additionally, it is related to clearance for squat. As the bar sits loaded in its “passive” position and it is un-racked from there, I measure just shy of 3” clearance. This necessitates perfect squat form on the rise so as not to accidentally contact front of monos. Which is good to encourage perfect form, but with heavier weight, 500 pounds plus, and pushing towards failure, sometimes I come a few inches forward. So that’s when I have to be very, very careful.
I can get a full 5 inches of clearance with the MM, if I adjust setup, and have a bit of a rear motion lift off and If I physically pull arms to the rear, further than their natural place where they want to sit with weight. But it feels a bit awkward getting positioned, probably also due to the fact that these have spring resistance. It is likely that I’m not used to using monos at all, and spring loaded in particular, and I just need to play with them and it will become more natural feeling with time.
One thing as far as clearance from another perspective is that there is 48” outer edge of one Snap Back to opposite outer edge of the other on a 41” wide REP rack. Now add 2 more inches in width on a Rogue, which will make the distance of the outer edges of Snap Backs 50” apart. Inner plate edges are 53 3/4” apart from each other on an OPB. So your re-racking clearance for your plates will be 3 3/4” split in half.
Can’t say enough good things about these!

(5.00)
Just sold my pair recently but these were awesome for heavy benching and training alone. Easy to get set in position for max effort benches without worrying about tearing up shoulders and pecs as you would when having to reach behind on a normal bench to unrack. Never used them for squats so can’t comment on that. Had them for years and they still looked basically new.

(5.00)
Love these boys helps with shoulder pain for benching heavy multiple times a week and look slick are and made in USA by a cool dude


